The first time I wore pants to an LDS church was about three months ago. It. Was. Fabulous.
For those unfamiliar with the culture standards within an LDS Sacrament Meeting, it is generally a dress shoe, dress (or skirt), hosiery kind of event for women; a white shirt, tie, and dress shoes kind of event for men. It is my belief that one reason for this huge push towards skirts for women, ties for men is to emphasize even further gender differences and segregation. I find generally that when it comes to female and male, Mormons like very clear, bold, etched in stone lines that are not to be crossed. I'm not entirely sure what the big deal is, but this seems to be the way of it.
The first time I wore pants to my home ward, which I have attended for two and half years now, I was greeted as an investigator. This cracks me up just a little. What is it about pants that says, "I am an investigator"? Is it that I am obviously oblivious to the "right" way of dressing?
|
if you wear denim, good for you,
but do not criticize my pants. |
We are advised to wear Sunday best. Everyone's is different. Many times, my dress pants are way more dressy than the skirts and dresses I see (I'm not judging, merely setting up the comparison. I think you should worship in whatever works for you). If you wear denim to church, you forgo your right to criticize my dress pants. Sorry. Hubby gave me the advice to look up General Conference talks on skirts on LDS.org last night. Here are the results: 13 talks total include the word "skirt." Four discuss the length of skirts. Another four use the word "skirt" in a context besides an article of clothing. The last five describe what someone in a story is wearing. You know what "skirt" was not used for? To describe what you should or shouldn't wear to the church or the Temple. Although I did find a message from the First Presidency (The Prophet and his counselors) that reported that they
intentionally did not dictate what Sunday Best is. So...quit being a hater.
I think this is a case of Crime as Normal. What is Crime as Normal? Gather round, children; it's Sociology time! The concept of Crime as Normal was created by Emile Durkheim. Oversimplified it means that crime is crime because it is different/ offensive to the society. The example that was used to first explain this to me was this: If there was a Utopian society in which everyone was the same and no one ever had a cold- no one ever coughed or sneezed- and one person sneezed regularly, that behavior would start off as strange, move towards inappropriate, inch towards offensive, and finally graduate to crime. So dear ones, my point is this: My wearing pants is not a bad thing unless it is simply because it makes others uncomfortable.
Another reaction I get quite often is discomfort or hostility. Many people chitter-chatter to others about the pants and their inappropriate appearance at church. About this I have several thoughts:
- Way to discuss how I am not being a very good Latter-day Saint via GOSSIP. That's pretty bold. Good job. As a side note, know that in most life scenarios, and in an LDS ward in particular, nothing you say will remain private, and inevitably, what you say will get back to the person who is the subject of your conversation.
- I'm curious as to what makes me unapproachable to ask about the pants. Is it me personally? Or the actual pants? Very few (as in one) people have outright asked about my reasons for wearing pants.
|
doesn't she look nice? |
So let's get it out in the open; Why do I wear pants?
- I have a young son who constant wiggles and pulls on my clothing- would you rather see my underwear or my pants?
- I have a young son who needs chasing after at a moments notice- there is no time to make sure everything is in a modest place.
- I prefer to sit cross legged (Indian style). Pants provide that ability.
- Skirts are so complicated. If the material pulls, I have to wear a slip. Not just any old slip, but a slip that won't slide down to be below the hem of my skirt or ride up to just below my breasts. UGH. This usually results in several trips to the bathroom to adjust and readjust all of my clothing.
- I don't have to shave my legs to wear pants in order to not get grossed out looks. Deal.
- Pants are warmer. I was in Ohio in January, and holy moley, I don't know why anyone there would even keep a skirt in their closet in the winter time.
My thoughts are that we pants wearers need to band together because there is strength in numbers. Check out Miri's blog about pants to church
here. Also, if you think you'd be more comfortable in pants, do it! It is
not a sin. If you feel the need to dress it up further than just dress pants, sport some high heels or pearls or fancy accessories. Break out of the box of social inertia.